Claude Opus 4.8 vs Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

A

Claude Opus 4.8

Anthropic
$5.00 / $25.00
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
G

Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)

Google
$0.50 / $3.00
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
A
G
Verdict: Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) is 8.9× cheaper than Claude Opus 4.8 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Claude Opus 4.8 has the larger context window (1M vs 131K).
Claude Opus 4.8Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)
Input price / 1M$5.00$0.50
Output price / 1M$25.00$3.00
Blended price (3:1)$10.00$1.13
Cached input / 1M$0.50
Context window1M131K
Max output128K33K
Intelligence index41.8
Coding index74.3
Providers112
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%100.0%
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesNo
Released2026-05-272026-06-18
Retirement

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 4.8 or Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)?

Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) is 8.9× cheaper than Claude Opus 4.8 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Claude Opus 4.8 vs Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image): which has a bigger context window?

Claude Opus 4.8: 1,000,000 tokens. Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image): 131,072 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Claude Opus 4.8 ≈ $22,500, Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) ≈ $2,500.

More comparisons