Claude Opus 4.5 vs GLM 5.3 FlashX
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: GLM 5.3 FlashX is 16.9× cheaper than Claude Opus 4.5 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. GLM 5.3 FlashX has the larger context window (1M vs 200K).
| Claude Opus 4.5 | GLM 5.3 FlashX | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $5.00 | $0.37 |
| Output price / 1M | $25.00 | $1.25 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $10.00 | $0.59 |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.50 | $0.09 |
| Context window | 200K | 1M |
| Max output | 64K | 131K |
| Intelligence index | — | — |
| Coding index | — | — |
| Providers | — | 1 |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | — | 100.0% |
| Vision input | Yes | Yes |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Released | 2025-11-24 | 2026-09-18 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 4.5 or GLM 5.3 FlashX?
GLM 5.3 FlashX is 16.9× cheaper than Claude Opus 4.5 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
Claude Opus 4.5 vs GLM 5.3 FlashX: which has a bigger context window?
Claude Opus 4.5: 200,000 tokens. GLM 5.3 FlashX: 1,048,576 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Claude Opus 4.5 ≈ $22,500, GLM 5.3 FlashX ≈ $1,365.
More comparisons
Claude Opus 4.5 vs GLM 5.3 PrimeClaude Opus 4.5 vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeClaude Opus 4.5 vs Command A+Claude Opus 4.5 vs GPT-6 Luna ProClaude Opus 4.5 vs GPT-6 LunaClaude Opus 4.5 vs GPT-6 Sol ProClaude Opus 4.5 vs GPT-6 SolClaude Opus 4.5 vs Claude Opus 5.5Claude Opus 4.5 vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeedClaude Opus 4.5 vs MiMo-V2.6-FlashClaude Opus 4.5 vs Grok 4.7Claude Opus 4.5 vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashClaude Opus 4.5 vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashClaude Opus 4.5 vs GPT-6 AstraClaude Opus 4.5 vs GPT-6 Astra ProClaude Opus 4.5 vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)GLM 5.3 FlashX vs GLM 5.3 PrimeGLM 5.3 FlashX vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeGLM 5.3 FlashX vs Command A+GLM 5.3 FlashX vs GPT-6 Luna ProGLM 5.3 FlashX vs GPT-6 LunaGLM 5.3 FlashX vs GPT-6 Sol ProGLM 5.3 FlashX vs GPT-6 SolGLM 5.3 FlashX vs Claude Opus 5.5