Claude Fable 5 vs Qwen3.8 27B
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: Qwen3.8 27B is 18.8× cheaper than Claude Fable 5 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Claude Fable 5 scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (49.6 vs 33.7).
| Claude Fable 5 | Qwen3.8 27B | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $10.00 | $0.42 |
| Output price / 1M | $50.00 | $3.00 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $20.00 | $1.06 |
| Cached input / 1M | $1.00 | $0.085 |
| Context window | 1M | 1M |
| Max output | 128K | 131K |
| Intelligence index | 49.6 | 33.7 |
| Coding index | 76.5 | 68.1 |
| Providers | 6 | 16 |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Vision input | Yes | Yes |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Released | 2026-06-09 | 2026-08-14 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, Claude Fable 5 or Qwen3.8 27B?
Qwen3.8 27B is 18.8× cheaper than Claude Fable 5 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
Claude Fable 5 vs Qwen3.8 27B: which has a bigger context window?
Claude Fable 5: 1,000,000 tokens. Qwen3.8 27B: 1,000,000 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Claude Fable 5 ≈ $45,000, Qwen3.8 27B ≈ $2,340.
More comparisons
Claude Fable 5 vs GLM 5.3 PrimeClaude Fable 5 vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeClaude Fable 5 vs Command A+Claude Fable 5 vs GPT-6 Luna ProClaude Fable 5 vs GPT-6 LunaClaude Fable 5 vs GPT-6 Sol ProClaude Fable 5 vs GPT-6 SolClaude Fable 5 vs Claude Opus 5.5Claude Fable 5 vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeedClaude Fable 5 vs MiMo-V2.6-FlashClaude Fable 5 vs Grok 4.7Claude Fable 5 vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashClaude Fable 5 vs GLM 5.3 FlashXClaude Fable 5 vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashClaude Fable 5 vs GPT-6 AstraClaude Fable 5 vs GPT-6 Astra ProQwen3.8 27B vs GLM 5.3 PrimeQwen3.8 27B vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeQwen3.8 27B vs Command A+Qwen3.8 27B vs GPT-6 Luna ProQwen3.8 27B vs GPT-6 LunaQwen3.8 27B vs GPT-6 Sol ProQwen3.8 27B vs GPT-6 SolQwen3.8 27B vs Claude Opus 5.5