Aion 3.5 Mini vs Llama 4 Scout
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: Llama 4 Scout is 5.8× cheaper than Aion 3.5 Mini on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Llama 4 Scout has the larger context window (1.3M vs 262K).
| Aion 3.5 Mini | Llama 4 Scout | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $0.70 | $0.10 |
| Output price / 1M | $1.40 | $0.30 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $0.87 | $0.15 |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.18 | — |
| Context window | 262K | 1.3M |
| Max output | 33K | 16K |
| Intelligence index | — | — |
| Coding index | — | 8.2 |
| Providers | — | 3 |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | — | 99.9% |
| Vision input | No | Yes |
| Reasoning | Yes | No |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Released | 2026-09-23 | 2025-04-05 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, Aion 3.5 Mini or Llama 4 Scout?
Llama 4 Scout is 5.8× cheaper than Aion 3.5 Mini on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
Aion 3.5 Mini vs Llama 4 Scout: which has a bigger context window?
Aion 3.5 Mini: 262,144 tokens. Llama 4 Scout: 1,310,720 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Aion 3.5 Mini ≈ $2,100, Llama 4 Scout ≈ $350.00.
More comparisons
Aion 3.5 Mini vs GLM 5.3 PrimeAion 3.5 Mini vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeAion 3.5 Mini vs Command A+Aion 3.5 Mini vs GPT-6 Luna ProAion 3.5 Mini vs GPT-6 LunaAion 3.5 Mini vs GPT-6 Sol ProAion 3.5 Mini vs GPT-6 SolAion 3.5 Mini vs Claude Opus 5.5Aion 3.5 Mini vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeedAion 3.5 Mini vs MiMo-V2.6-FlashAion 3.5 Mini vs Grok 4.7Aion 3.5 Mini vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashAion 3.5 Mini vs GLM 5.3 FlashXAion 3.5 Mini vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashAion 3.5 Mini vs GPT-6 AstraAion 3.5 Mini vs GPT-6 Astra ProLlama 4 Scout vs GLM 5.3 PrimeLlama 4 Scout vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeLlama 4 Scout vs Command A+Llama 4 Scout vs GPT-6 Luna ProLlama 4 Scout vs GPT-6 LunaLlama 4 Scout vs GPT-6 Sol ProLlama 4 Scout vs GPT-6 SolLlama 4 Scout vs Claude Opus 5.5