Aion-3.0 vs GLM 5.3 FlashX
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: GLM 5.3 FlashX is 6.4× cheaper than Aion-3.0 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. GLM 5.3 FlashX has the larger context window (1M vs 131K).
| Aion-3.0 | GLM 5.3 FlashX | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $3.00 | $0.37 |
| Output price / 1M | $6.00 | $1.25 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $3.75 | $0.59 |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.75 | $0.09 |
| Context window | 131K | 1M |
| Max output | 33K | 131K |
| Intelligence index | — | — |
| Coding index | — | — |
| Providers | — | 1 |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | — | 100.0% |
| Vision input | No | Yes |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Released | 2026-07-07 | 2026-09-18 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, Aion-3.0 or GLM 5.3 FlashX?
GLM 5.3 FlashX is 6.4× cheaper than Aion-3.0 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
Aion-3.0 vs GLM 5.3 FlashX: which has a bigger context window?
Aion-3.0: 131,072 tokens. GLM 5.3 FlashX: 1,048,576 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Aion-3.0 ≈ $9,000, GLM 5.3 FlashX ≈ $1,365.
More comparisons
Aion-3.0 vs GLM 5.3 PrimeAion-3.0 vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeAion-3.0 vs Command A+Aion-3.0 vs GPT-6 Luna ProAion-3.0 vs GPT-6 LunaAion-3.0 vs GPT-6 Sol ProAion-3.0 vs GPT-6 SolAion-3.0 vs Claude Opus 5.5Aion-3.0 vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeedAion-3.0 vs MiMo-V2.6-FlashAion-3.0 vs Grok 4.7Aion-3.0 vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashAion-3.0 vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashAion-3.0 vs GPT-6 AstraAion-3.0 vs GPT-6 Astra ProAion-3.0 vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)GLM 5.3 FlashX vs GLM 5.3 PrimeGLM 5.3 FlashX vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeGLM 5.3 FlashX vs Command A+GLM 5.3 FlashX vs GPT-6 Luna ProGLM 5.3 FlashX vs GPT-6 LunaGLM 5.3 FlashX vs GPT-6 Sol ProGLM 5.3 FlashX vs GPT-6 SolGLM 5.3 FlashX vs Claude Opus 5.5