Aion-2.0 vs Llama 4 Scout
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: Llama 4 Scout is 6.7× cheaper than Aion-2.0 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Llama 4 Scout has the larger context window (1.3M vs 131K).
| Aion-2.0 | Llama 4 Scout | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $0.80 | $0.10 |
| Output price / 1M | $1.60 | $0.30 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $1.00 | $0.15 |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.20 | — |
| Context window | 131K | 1.3M |
| Max output | 33K | 16K |
| Intelligence index | — | — |
| Coding index | — | 8.2 |
| Providers | — | 3 |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | — | 99.9% |
| Vision input | No | Yes |
| Reasoning | Yes | No |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Released | 2026-02-23 | 2025-04-05 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, Aion-2.0 or Llama 4 Scout?
Llama 4 Scout is 6.7× cheaper than Aion-2.0 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
Aion-2.0 vs Llama 4 Scout: which has a bigger context window?
Aion-2.0: 131,072 tokens. Llama 4 Scout: 1,310,720 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Aion-2.0 ≈ $2,400, Llama 4 Scout ≈ $350.00.
More comparisons
Aion-2.0 vs GLM 5.3 PrimeAion-2.0 vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeAion-2.0 vs Command A+Aion-2.0 vs GPT-6 Luna ProAion-2.0 vs GPT-6 LunaAion-2.0 vs GPT-6 Sol ProAion-2.0 vs GPT-6 SolAion-2.0 vs Claude Opus 5.5Aion-2.0 vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeedAion-2.0 vs MiMo-V2.6-FlashAion-2.0 vs Grok 4.7Aion-2.0 vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashAion-2.0 vs GLM 5.3 FlashXAion-2.0 vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashAion-2.0 vs GPT-6 AstraAion-2.0 vs GPT-6 Astra ProLlama 4 Scout vs GLM 5.3 PrimeLlama 4 Scout vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeLlama 4 Scout vs Command A+Llama 4 Scout vs GPT-6 Luna ProLlama 4 Scout vs GPT-6 LunaLlama 4 Scout vs GPT-6 Sol ProLlama 4 Scout vs GPT-6 SolLlama 4 Scout vs Claude Opus 5.5